← Fame through time1830-1839
The 1830s
Whose names filled the books of the 1830s - anyone at all, however long dead - counted as mentions per million words printed, so a period that simply published more does not inflate anyone.
Talked about then
Whose names appeared most in Italian books during the 1830s, whenever they lived.
- 1
Antonio da Correggio5.8 - 2
Giotto4.0 - 3
Pietro Perugino2.9 - 4
Caravaggio2.6 - 5
Andrea Doria2.6 - 6
Lorenzo de' Medici2.5 - 7
Donato Bramante2.4 - 8
Tintoretto2.3 - 9
Paul the Deacon2.2 - 10
Apostolo Zeno2.2 - 11
Torquato Tasso2.2 - 12
Domenichino2.1 - 13
Charles Borromeo1.9 - 14
Guercino1.9 - 15
Philip Neri1.8 - 16
Dante Alighieri1.8 - 17
Cimabue1.7 - 18
Giulio Romano1.7 - 19
Prospero Colonna1.5 - 20
Leonardo da Vinci1.5 - 21
Cosimo de' Medici1.4 - 22
Pinturicchio1.4 - 23
Marco Polo1.2 - 24
Petrarch1.2 - 25
Donatello1.2
Lived then
The most notable people whose working lives fell in the 1830s, ranked where coverage and readership agree.
- 1
Alexander Pushkin21 decades - 2
Victor Hugo22 decades - 3
Alexandre Dumasnot measured- - 4
Mary Shelley16 decades - 5
James K. Polk20 decades - 6
George Sand20 decades
- 7
Honoré de Balzac17 decades - 8
Millard Fillmore19 decades - 9
Franklin Pierce20 decades - 10
Ralph Waldo Emerson19 decades - 11
Nicholas I of Russia19 decades - 12
Benjamin Disraeli18 decades - 13
Giacomo Leopardi22 decades - 14
Heinrich Heine21 decades
- 15
Nathaniel Hawthorne19 decades - 16
William I, German Emperornot measured-
- 17
Eugène Delacroix20 decades - 18
Napoleon IInot measured- - 19
Hector Berlioz19 decades - 20
Thomas Carlyle20 decades - 21
Auguste Comte22 decades - 22
John Brownnot measured- - 23
Sojourner Truth13 decades - 24
Adolphe Thiers15 decades - 25
Pedro I of Brazil0 decades
How to read these rankings
- Attention, not reputation. A place on these lists reflects the attention a person still draws in the public record. It is not a judgement on the life.
- Fame in print. The curves show how often a name appeared in the books of each decade from 1800 to 2019, drawn from the Google Books Ngram corpus.
- Gaps are left as gaps. Where the record is too thin to be fair, we would rather show nothing than guess.