Henric Sanielevici
✓ Source-basedrisingRomanian journalist and literary critic, also remembered for his work in anthropology, ethnography, sociology and zoology (1875-1951)
Henric Sanielevici was a Romanian journalist and literary critic, also remembered for his work in anthropology, ethnography, sociology and zoology.
Photos 7
Socialist reunion in Bucharest, 1892, with Constantin Dobrogeanu-Gherea and Constantin Mille in the foreground. Henric Sanielevici is in the fourth row, third from the right; on his sides are poet Ion Păun-Pincio (right) and journalist Henric Streitman. Simion Sanielevici is same row, seventh from the right.
From right: Garabet Ibrăileanu, Constantin Stere and their Viața Românească colleague Ion Botez, c. 1905
Romanian prisoners' convoy in Bulgaria, 1920 drawing by Nicolae Tonitza
An allegory of workers' emancipation and social democracy, published by Constantin Dobrogeanu-Gherea's Lumea Nouă magazine (1895)
Dryopithecus jaw (1893 illustration to Jovan Žujović's Kameno doba)
Purported "Jewish types". Popular Science illustration, 1898Scientists born in the 1870s 6
About this person
Henric Sanielevici was a Romanian journalist and literary critic, also remembered for his work in anthropology, ethnography, sociology and zoology. Initially a militant socialist from the political-philosophical circle of Constantin Dobrogeanu-Gherea, he incorporated other influences and, in 1905, created his own literary review, Curentul Nou. Sanielevici and his friend Garabet Ibrăileanu were among the founders of "Poporanism", a peasant-oriented and left-wing movement. However, Sanielevici soon detached himself from both Marxism and agrarianism, criticizing Romanian traditionalist literature, and prophesying a Neoclassicism for the working men. His heated polemic with the rival school of Sămănătorul journal isolated him from the other Poporanists, whom he eventually denounced as "reactionaries". More controversy surrounded his ambiguous attitudes during World War I.
Fame.am measures public visibility signals. It does not measure human value, talent, morality, or credibility.