93,728 profiles ranked live

Richard Swinburne

✓ Source-basedstable

British philosopher of religion

United KingdomAcademicsBorn 1934 · age 91
CompareClaim
Fame54.1
Momentum1.7
Languages24
In century#20,430

Richard Granville Swinburne is an English philosopher. He is an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford. Over the last 50 years, Swinburne has been a proponent of philosophical arguments for the existence of God.

Also inDeutsch

Photos 1

In their own words 3

Richard Swinburne
said · 1998
Own words

I thus understand by a «theodicy» not an account of God’s actual reasons for allowing a bad state to occur, but an account of his possible reasons

p. 15

Wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0

Richard Swinburne
said
Own words

A cosmological argument is an argument to the existence of God from the existence of some finite object or, more specifically, a complex physical universe.

pp. 136-137

Wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0

Richard Swinburne
said
Own words

The starting points of cosmological arguments are evident facets of experience. There is no doubt about the truth of statements that report that they hold.

pp. 136-137

Wikiquote, CC BY-SA 4.0

Awards 2

James Joyce Awards
Fellow of the British Academy

Connected to Richard 6

About this person

Richard Granville Swinburne is an English philosopher. He is an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford. Over the last 50 years, Swinburne has been a proponent of philosophical arguments for the existence of God. His philosophical contributions are primarily in the philosophy of religion and philosophy of science. He aroused much discussion with his early work in the philosophy of religion, a trilogy of books consisting of The Coherence of Theism, The Existence of God, and Faith and Reason. He has been influential in reviving substance dualism as an option in philosophy of mind.

Country
United Kingdom
Category
Academics
Type
Academic
Status
living
Dates
Born 1934 · age 91
Written about in
24 languages

Fame.am measures public visibility signals. It does not measure human value, talent, morality, or credibility.