Peter Singer is read about 1,068 times a day, in 53 languages.
A typical day, 30 days to 21 October 2026
The middle day of the days counted, so one week of news cannot move it. The line under it is the last 396 days, one point a day.
Something wrong?He asks how much you owe strangers drowning on the other side of the world, and whether a life lived for pleasure might be the only moral mathematics that matters. His answers - utilitarian, unsentimental, often uncomfortable - made him one of the most argued-over philosophers alive.
A life in dates
Also in Deutsch
Photos 8
In their own words 10
Living a minimally acceptable ethical life involves using a substantial part of our spare resources to make the world a better place.
We do not have to make self- sacrifice a necessary element of altruism.
Science does not stand still, and neither does philosophy, although the latter has a tendency to walk in circles.
Awards
Family
Parents
Is this everyone?
Only relatives with a profile here are drawn, so a family can be larger than this. A line here can also be wrong.
Correct this familyAbout this person
Born 6 July 1946, Singer built his career at Monash University, where he twice chaired the philosophy department and founded its Centre for Human Bioethics. In 1975 he published Animal Liberation, the case for veganism that reshaped how millions thought about what they ate. His essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" followed the same unsentimental logic outward: if you can prevent suffering at little cost to yourself, you must. For decades he held to preference utilitarianism, but in 2014's The Point of View of the Universe, co-written with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, he disclosed the turn to hedonistic utilitarianism. He co-founded Animals Australia, launched the non-profit The Life You Can Save, stood unsuccessfully for the Australian Senate as a Greens candidate in 1996, and now holds the title Emeritus Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton.
In common with Peter
Fame.am measures public visibility signals. It does not measure human value, talent, morality, or credibility.